<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Calgary Mortgage and Real Estate Market Strong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gregwilliamson.ca/blog/2009/06/16/calgary-mortgage-and-real-estate-market-strong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gregwilliamson.ca/uncategorized/calgary-mortgage-and-real-estate-market-strong/</link>
	<description>Canadian and Alberta Real Estate and Mortgage Market Information with a slant toward positive comments in light of all the negative information out there</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 19:35:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: davers</title>
		<link>http://www.gregwilliamson.ca/uncategorized/calgary-mortgage-and-real-estate-market-strong/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>davers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gregwilliamson.ca/blog/?p=416#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Prices rose in April you say? CMHC says so, but they have a vested interest in people buying houses, so I always take what they say with a grain of salt.

Teranet shows 10 straight months of decline in Calgary. I would tend to trust the teranet data more simply because their sample method makes a whole bunch more sense to me than the benchmark method.  www.housepriceindex.ca if you want to check it out.

&lt;em&gt; My sources are Calgary Real Estate Board Metro Calgary Single Family Homes. The methodology on the Teranet site shows a different calculation then simple median prices of all real estate year over year that I am using.

- Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prices rose in April you say? CMHC says so, but they have a vested interest in people buying houses, so I always take what they say with a grain of salt.</p>
<p>Teranet shows 10 straight months of decline in Calgary. I would tend to trust the teranet data more simply because their sample method makes a whole bunch more sense to me than the benchmark method.  <a href="http://www.housepriceindex.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.housepriceindex.ca</a> if you want to check it out.</p>
<p><em> My sources are Calgary Real Estate Board Metro Calgary Single Family Homes. The methodology on the Teranet site shows a different calculation then simple median prices of all real estate year over year that I am using.</p>
<p>- Greg</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

